feedburner
Masukan Alamat Email Kamu:

More Great Windows XP or Windows Vista

Diposting oleh Admin Label:

Comparing these two operating systems are tricky. Such questions (even better Windows XP or Windows Vista) may be equated with the question we are better to eat tempeh or eating out, just the same as having an important role in human life. You know the answer to the title of the excerpt above??, He ...., The author also too dizzy to determine which would be the winner. But Dad was not, his name is also more to learn, would not ya know everything.

The first one I want to highlight, of course, is the lipstick / 2 windows facenya of it (like the girl he ... yes). According to where you pretty? If anyone said that there are abnormalities Xp, he ... ... Beautiful Vista khan? All agree? (yes agree, .... Thank you for your support). But then her face was more beautiful the higher the quality of powder is needed (hardware times). Look at the variety of knick-knacks that Bill Gates input into windows Vista (no live thumbnails, aero, etc) all require considerable hardware specs classy, especially for VGA. To be able to run Vista Aero smoothly least sampeyan use VGA with Pixel Shader 2.0 with 128 MB memory, it said "read me" Vista. What about XP, is an ancient face?.
Ancient's actually not, but if the 2nd monitor align Xp and Vista so should people choose Vista, because it's yes that's art, the more stylish interface, the more that happy (rich cie designer only). But of course not need tanpilan Xp VGA Pixel shader pake tuh, carrying a minimum resolution of 800 x 600 only easy to use, and of course bozzz speeding. Continued, the conclusion what then? for the first point depends on your tastes, your reply love beautiful view, leave XP right now and look for Vista. Do not use a pirated it? sales pity no one bought, not a little expensive that an important issue you have come to succeed the anti-piracy software.
Hold a second that I want to highlight is the problem of speed work. That need to be highlighted is the product of two tuh run on computers with the same spec, about a fast one?. well people who just know a little computer would be answering any slower Vista, So, what can be inferred, because there is no need to question again? Yes most of you who like a fast computer activity, do not expect Vista pake your desire will be fulfilled. So for those who still pake XP and want the computer to work quickly, do not have to think to move to Vista (I did one), unless you have additional funds for upgrading your hardware to higher ground. But somehow, at the same spec fixed faster Xp.
Continued in terms of price, which is more expensive huh? Yes vista is, a more recent, the new product was cheaper than the old products, rather than funny. Besides Vista is there are so many additional features, so it is not wrong if Vista sold at higher prices. What conclusions hold, then? Yes reply you've got the money not used anymore, mending using vista, after all, the future would be left Xp, Vista users now have already looked at Seven. Unless you like jadul operating system, then use XP (he .... I'm sorry Brooo not joking, but insulting, ... just kidding))).
Let alone keep it? Oh yes another feature, it turns out there's a million additional features compared to XP (One Million?? Loads?? Not, just lip service only). Clearly there are some added features, he said in terms of added security, in addition to the interface that had been discussed at the first point. But yes emang right sie, to connect XP to Vista only (with the default settings) asked this question a bunch of it and so on. Just a lot of security. Conclusions hold for this point what? Yes obviously Vista, the security given good not more want, what already have their own security? for me yes?
Continue on the level with the new software kompetibel was good, the mo use ancient software on, when progress (he .... No insult you know, it is only motivation, he ...). Software producers always make software for the operating system was new. So do not close the possibility of later XP no longer supported by major software makers, rich Adobe, Ulead, Borland, etc.. So put on a vista to be able to always get updates from the software you use. Anything else I forgot, you must have a fairly high hardware so that all the features of Vista can run.
Here I provide the minimum specifications for Vista to run on your computer:
  1. 1 GHz processor minimum
  2. Ram 512 MB 
  3. DVD ROM Drive (Instalernya been using DVD media. CD media have been left by Windows Vista and next generation)
  4. HD 20 GB for system
  5. VGA supports Pixel Shader 2.0 with 128 MB ram
  6. Keyboard+mouse
  7. Monitor of course, of no use to see what will (he ...)
Try now compare with XP that he could walk with hardware specs (but open he said, cz authors also tried, and found it can walk, although slow really):
  1. Processor 266 MHz
  2. Ram 64 MB
  3. HD 1,5 for system 
  4. CD ROM Drive
  5. VGA with resolution 800 x 600
  6. Keyboard and mouse
  7. Monitor
There already know the difference, obviously Vista is more expensive hardware than XP, but if you have more money to buy hardware for mending Vista. So, the conclusion of all what donk?? Turned back to each of us, like that which, the author's own reply frankly like Vista, because ciamik view, a good performance (if the hardware is a good balance), more kompetible with new software, more stable, good security, and of course it is still a long expiration period, and of course there is always a good online updates.
So what can the sharing, may be useful

........................

Related Articles :



0 komentar:

Posting Komentar

Langganan: Posting Komentar (Atom)